Which logical fallacy asks one to accept a conclusion without providing real evidence?

The logical fallacy that involves accepting a conclusion without real evidence is identified as begging the question. This fallacy occurs when an argument's premise assumes the truth of the conclusion instead of providing evidence for it. In essence, it creates a circular argument where the conclusion is supported by the premise that already assumes the conclusion to be true. This lack of substantive proof means that the argument doesn't effectively persuade or inform the audience, as it doesn't engage with real evidence or logical reasoning.

In a context where one might encounter arguments, recognizing begging the question helps in critically evaluating the strength of claims being made, especially in discussions or debates where arguments may not be based on actual evidence.